Okay, I decided to resolve this and send M to the participants that betted on the "Other" I mistakenly added, as if this would have resolved NA.

If you feel like this does not work out favourably for you than please let me know.

@SamBogerd this can resolve to Dick Schoof. Thanks!

Okay so it seems I may have fucked up the setup of this question, to make sure it ends in a relatively fair way I will resolve it as other AND the candidate that eventually be picked.

Unless someone proposes a more fair way to deal with the situation.

@SamBogerd Cool thanks so 'Other' is free money now...

@SamBogerd This is not fair at all, because 'Other' is automatically split when someone proposes a new candidate.

@Bart5f6d There's 2 "other" answers. I assume the one that auto-splits will not pay out. You can recognize that one because there's a ⓘ next to it.

@SamBogerd I think the way I would handle this is to rename the extra "Other" to "DELETED" or whatever, maybe reimbursing people who have shares in it, then only resolve to the actual answer. It's not a lot of people and they didn't spend much on it:

This seems to incorrect

lol, selling my "other" stock because it seems it becomes valueless the moment someone adds the winning option

@hominidan No, it will be split.

@Bart5f6d Actualy no, the question is misconfigured.

@Bart5f6d yes, one of the others needs to be N/A

Made a fixed payout version:

@jskf https://manifold.markets/JuJumper/who-will-be-the-next-prime-minister-29d4c74f0956