Background: The Waluigi Effect
(If GTrends isn't granular to compare particular days, I'll use the week or highest resolution data which contains both April 1st and May 1st of 2023.)
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ73 | |
| 2 | Ṁ39 | |
| 3 | Ṁ24 | |
| 4 | Ṁ16 | |
| 5 | Ṁ11 |
People are also trading
@Muskwalker Huh, I just did that check yesterday and it showed 65 for April 1. I wonder why Google trends isn't being consistent - pretty concerning for defining this market.
@Gabrielle 1) I don't know if time zones are a factor, which might make a difference
2) I do know that these ranks are apparently relative: "Numbers represent search interest relative to the highest point on the chart for the given region and time. A value of 100 is the peak popularity for the term. A value of 50 means that the term is half as popular. A score of 0 means there was not enough data for this term." (For this screenshot I chose a timeframe starting from the day this market opened.)
3) The above screenshot is worldwide numbers; the search defaults to US, which has weirdly different data: 80 for the no-quoted term on April 1st, and its peak on April 8—a date where 'worldwide' has 0 for both terms.
