Are the Mexican alien bodies real? (scientific journal, 2025)
closes 2025

Will one of the top 100 scientific journals listed here publish an article endorsing the view that the most likely explanation for the purported alien bodies presented in Mexico in September 2023 is that they are are genuine at any time before the end of 2025?

Get Ṁ500 play money

Related questions

will we have evedence of aliens before 9000?
CimoreneBlume avatarCimorene Blume
47% chance
Will the scientific consensus that the universe's expansion is accelerating end before the end of 2030?
jacksonpolack avatarjackson polack
11% chance
Will proof of life of extraterrestrial origin be found by 2100?
username avatardisplay name
41% chance
Will the US government confirm the existence of aliens on Earth before the end of 2023?
ahalekelly avatarAdrian
2% chance
Will an exomoon be discovered by the end of 2025?
tkillestein avatarTom Killestein
54% chance
Does Planet Nine exist?
IsaacKing avatarIsaac
52% chance
Will NASA confirm the discovery of aliens Benefit 2025?
13% chance
Will humanity detect evidence of an extraterrestrial intelligence before the year 2100?
Meta_C avatarMeta C
26% chance
Will a new interstellar object be observed inside the solar system in 2023 ?
Odoacre avatarOdoacre
24% chance
Will we find strong evidence for extraterrestrial life by 2030?
Shump avatarShump
13% chance
Will strong evidence of aliens be discovered before 2030?
cash avatarcshunter
12% chance
Will scientists confirm a 5th force of nature before 2026?
BradBooker avatarBrad Booker
18% chance
In 2100, will there be an expert consensus that aliens have been observed?
JonathanRay avatarJonathan Ray
23% chance
Will the New York Times declare that there is definitive proof of non-Earth-originating life by 2030?
NathanNguyen avatarNathan Nguyen
18% chance
Will planet k2-18b be confirmed to contain a major sign of Alien Life: DMS (dimethyl sulphide)
elf avatarElf
24% chance
By EOY 2100, will humanity have sent a probe to another star system and received meaningful info?
wadimiusz avatarVadim
28% chance
In which year will the first extraterrestrially mined material arrive on Earth?
Ansel avatarAnsel
Will the Galactica model receive acknowledgement in a paper published before 2024?
o avatarO
36% chance
Is the preprint suggesting Betelgeuse supernova within decades correct?
YaakovSaxon avatarYaakov Saxon
53% chance
Will a new species, previously unknown to science, be discovered in Lake Vostok by the end of 2025?
EricBolton avatarEric Bolton
64% chance
Sort by:
fb68 avatar
Юрий Бурак

Look at them and ask:

  1. Why is humanoid body found the first place? There are 1000 ways to hide it if aliens don't want to show themselves, and 1000 better ways to demonstrate yourself.

  1. Would this ribcage allow to breathe? Would these limbs move the body? Would this body support this head without falling front/back?

  2. Why to trust those who tell it's government of Mexico?

  3. Why to trust government of Mexico?

GoncaloM avatar
Gonçalo Mbought Ṁ20 of YES

It's a YES for me because of the insane +5000% return for the small risk 😂

SophusCorry avatar
Sophus Corrypredicts NO

@cloudprism god you scared me

jgyou avatar
JGYpredicts NO

The list of 100 journals could be listed directly instead of through a science stan page with tons of ads!

Chizardium avatar
Chizardiumbought Ṁ60 of NO

The guy who brought them has literally shown confirmed fake “aliens” before…

4 replies
Coagulopath avatar
Coagulopathbought Ṁ50 of NO

@Chizardium don't worry, I'm sure he's legit this time.

makoyass avatar
mako yass

@Chizardium If they were real aliens, the guy who got famous making hoax aliens would be first to find out about them and buy them, so it doesn't tell me that much.
The first people to get into anything are generally crazy, because to get to something first you have to start doing it before it makes sense.

DavidBolin avatar
David Bolin

@makoyass There is no reason to think these aliens are real, but this is correct.

People think it is evidence against a claim to show that the person making the claim has made false claims of that kind in the past.

But it is not; the person who would make the claim when it is true is exactly the same person as the person who would make the claim when it is false. They are not biased in favor of falsity: they are biased in favor of what the claim says.

makoyass avatar
mako yass

@DavidBolin it's evidence against, but it's not overwhelming evidence (or, proof)

SpennyFawcett avatar
Spenny Fawcett

Cannot even fathom anyone bought YES on this

3 replies
DavidBolin avatar
David Bolin

@SpennyFawcett People buy YES on "this resolves NO."

DavidBolin avatar
David Bolin

@SpennyFawcett As the Onceler once said, "who are you to say what the public will buy?"

Alfie avatar
Alfiesold Ṁ15 of YES

@SpennyFawcett stay poor kiddo

Symmetry avatar


NcyRocks avatar
N.C. Youngpredicts NO

>looking at the new alien claims

>ask the scientists if their aliens are humanoid or realistic

>they dont understand

>pull out diagram explaing what is humanoid and what is realistic

>they laugh and say "they're genuine aliens sir"

>look at the livestream

>theyre humanoid

4 replies
makoyass avatar
mako yass

@NcyRocks It's not unlikely for bipedalism and large skulls to be a convergent evolutionary attractor for technological species. Bipedalism enables covering larger territories (so, larger and much more complex, overlapping communities, more complex hunting patterns, need for long term planning, wider access to resources) and frees up the hands for tool use. Large skulls because brain.

I'd consider it a red flag if they had chins or noses (not attractors) but they don't.

NcyRocks avatar
N.C. Youngpredicts NO

@makoyass My real issue is that they look like vertebrates at all. They have four limbs attached to a main body, along with a head that has two eyes and a mouth. I'd be shocked if that exact schema evolved anywhere else in the universe that we might ever encounter. The particular resemblance to humans is a nail in the coffin.

makoyass avatar
mako yass

@NcyRocks That is again just an convergent attractor. You don't need more than two eyes for stereoscopy, and higher animal eyes are expensive. The sensors go at the front so that the earliest predators could see what they're biting, and that is why the mouth is there too. It's at one side because that's the direction the animal moves fastest in. The brain goes close to the eyes for latency reasons. (The nose goes there because the first breathing hole went there, and because nowhere else on the trachea would be convenient for pointing a sensory organ at things)

These things were fixed early in evolutionary history and it will go the same way every time.

From what I've heard, there's not supposed to be a convergent genetic language though. I've heard it argued that we should expect them to have different bases or something, which would make the 40% convergent genes uh, well the machine wouldn't have worked. It's possible those arguments were wrong though. I don't think we actually know how early life chose its genetic language.

makoyass avatar
mako yass

@makoyass Oh, another explanation for overlapping genomes is panspermia, which would also be an explanation for why our civs are alive (and small) at the same time.

JonathanRay avatar
Jonathan Ray

Humans have 70% of their dna in common with worms. It’s about the number I’d expect if basal bilatera got panspermiaed to alpha cemtauri along with some autotrophs and then independently evolved to spacefaring before us. But this is still almost certainly bs.

Phan avatar

cardiff giant round 2

Sailfish avatar
Sailfishbought Ṁ50 of NO

Manifold game: scroll through the "Yes" positions and try and figure out which people believe in fossilized aliens in Mexico, and which people believe in greater fool theory.

1 reply
cloudprism avatar
Hayden Jacksonpredicts YES

@Sailfish You're telling me this picture *isn't* enough evidence for you to believe in aliens?

Alfie avatar