Has the paper "Can GPT-4 Perform Neural Architecture Search?" significantly increased P(doom)?
8
190Ṁ114
resolved Jan 21
Resolved
N/A

https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10970

The beauty of this market is it doesn't matter what your P(doom) was before. It only matters what kind of Bayesian update you do as a result of this paper. If you significantly update towards doom, that's a Yes. If you don't, that's a No.

Market will be resolved by my judgement of what the expert consensus is. Experts who believe that P(doom)=0 but who still believe that the paper means that AGI will arrive faster, will count towards an overall consensus towards this proposition.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

⚠Unreceptive to pings in all closed markets ; AFK Creator

📢Resolved to N/A : Possibly Abandoned Market / Subjective & Creator has not engaged in comments.


@RobinGreen Please resolve your closed markets. Thank you!

Their conclusions are basically that their method can improve the architecture it suggests over a few iterations, but then it stagnates pretty quickly. It'll take more than that to summon an eldritch god out of formless chaos.

I also dock them a few doom tokens for how much of a stretch their acronym is.

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules