
https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10970
The beauty of this market is it doesn't matter what your P(doom) was before. It only matters what kind of Bayesian update you do as a result of this paper. If you significantly update towards doom, that's a Yes. If you don't, that's a No.
Market will be resolved by my judgement of what the expert consensus is. Experts who believe that P(doom)=0 but who still believe that the paper means that AGI will arrive faster, will count towards an overall consensus towards this proposition.
Their conclusions are basically that their method can improve the architecture it suggests over a few iterations, but then it stagnates pretty quickly. It'll take more than that to summon an eldritch god out of formless chaos.
I also dock them a few doom tokens for how much of a stretch their acronym is.