hey @crowlsyong just a heads up, your bot @RISKBOT is exploitable through head-fakes.

@deagol Thanks for the heads up. Pausing operation.

@RISKBOT Here's a lil treat. Now get back to work ya silly lil fella *scratches raccon's noggin'

@PuckMinder @mods reopen?

@PuckMinder

@traders some free mana here (I overexploited the bot, sorry)

ok then 🤷‍♂️

@PuckMinder

@PuckMinder well done @acc 😂

https://manifold.markets/bagelfan/will-the-yunaplan-for-liquidity-wor

@acc move fast and stuff ;)

@PuckMinder

@PuckMinder

@mods 24hrs since ping

@PuckMinder no market Thursday to honor Carter so I bet NO it can't be higher, but I guess N/A also makes sense.

@KeenenW Although it's technically (barely) down from yesterday's close, holders at yesterday's close (or rather before today's open) may be up (currently +1¢) thanks to the 25¢ ex-div today (record date is Monday) . This is why it shows as up in most sites eg. Google, Yahoo!, CNBC. I assume you will not adjust for the dividend, as the description seems pretty clear.

@deagol ah now it's up even without the 0.25 :)

@deagol and closed down even with the div lol

@deagol Looks like Nasdaq already accounts for the dividend. AAPL dropped $0.52 from yesterday's close, but the reported change is only -$0.27

@KeenenW They account for it in the quote for the day's change, but not in the historical data (link in description). But that's the question, which change does this market resolve to. Luckily no ambiguity today, but just by a hair. We should iron it out for the future.

• Each day resolves YES if AAPL increases from the previous day; Resolves NO if lower or flat

Given this is a point within the "resolves to" link, I'd interpret it as using the historical closing data in that linked table, not the daily quotes. I see nothing in the description about adjusting for dividends, although yes for splits (which of course makes perfect sense).

@deagol Ahh okay, Yeah I'll change the description to account for dividends too

@KeenenW Can you resolve last four days? Thanks.

@KeenenW ping... sorry to pester you but capital needs are kinda high atm. Thanks!

@deagol No need to apologize, I'll do a better job at keeping these resolved

@KeenenW thanks, and I must say you're already doing a pretty good job compared to a few others. Greatly appreciate the quick response and resolutions. :)

You should resolve before adding the new set, sorry couldn't help it 🙂