
My Manifold survey has a question asking which meta-ethical theories the respondent agrees with. Three of them are:
Consequentialism (Moral behavior is that with the best expected consequences. This can also include forms of rule utilitarianism where the consequences of following a rule, even when it has bad consequences in some situations, are better than deciding on a case-by-case basis.)
Deontology (Morality is based on following certain duties/rules that determine whether an action is right or wrong regardless of the consequences.)
Virtue ethics (Morality is based on behaving in a way that embodies certain virtues, not the consequences or intrinsic rightness/wrongness of actions.)
Which of these options will be selected by the most users?
See Plasma's Manifold Survey for other questions about the survey.
You can take the survey here: https://forms.gle/xZqWVxuY5irgLigu9
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ24 | |
2 | Ṁ17 | |
3 | Ṁ8 | |
4 | Ṁ7 | |
5 | Ṁ6 |
People are also trading
Consequentialism won by far:
https://plasmabloggin.substack.com/p/survey-results-pt-4-philosophy
@NicoDelon What term would you prefer I use? These are all theories about what makes something good or bad, which seems like meta-ethics to me.
@JosephNoonan These are normative ethical theories (about what is substantively right/wrong, good/bad etc.), whereas metaethical theories would be about the nature of right/wrong, good/bad etc. (e.g. does 'x is right' have a truth value or express a non-propositional attitude', is 'x is right' true or false objectively or only relative to particular standards).
@DavidMoss Okay, I agree this is a better title. It's still called meta-ethics on the survey because it also includes views about whether morality is objective, whether ethical views are propositions, etc., and because I think any complete meta-ethical theory is also a normative one (If you have a complete description of the nature of right and wrong, that's going to trivially entail a theory of what makes an action right or wrong).
@JosephNoonan I don’t think it’s trivial at all and that’s why professional metaethicists don’t claim to be doing normative ethics and vice versa.