Related questions
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ125 | |
2 | Ṁ119 | |
3 | Ṁ55 | |
4 | Ṁ20 | |
5 | Ṁ5 |
"biting criticism, speaking plainly, and calling out bullshit" is based. it's directly useful in the sense that the most biting possible criticism is a direct statement of something true that severely alters the usefulness of someone's actions or ideas. Which is valuable, it lets that person, or others, reallocate their time! accurate and deep criticism is missing in most areas. even on the EA forum, and EA is better than most about this, every few days I see a post that just seems wrong, and would benefit from deep or even shallow criticism, but doesn't have any. (shortform and uncertain but significant-sounding criticism is a lot less approved of than shortform "wow, im really excited for this"). EA (forum posts! i'm not an EA, i just read the forum) generally seems to have a bit too much 'so excited for this!' or 'lots of good stuff here' relative to, say, direct statements of disagreement.
OTOH i dont know you or about this general thing beyond reading a few dozen ea forum posts. nor do i know your reason for getting a bit more of a handle on your disagreeableness. but past disagreeable posts were fun reads.
but you asked!