Wild-animal suffering will be a mainstream moral issue by 2100, conditional on biological humans still existing
Basic
21
Ṁ4302100
51%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
Copied over from Elicit
Get Ṁ600 play money
Sort by:
In a hypothetical post-singularity scenario where the vast majority of remaining habitat zones are administered by (or with the assistance of) a superintelligent AI for the purposes of ecosystem preservation/optimisation, do the animals in them still qualify as 'wild'? I assume yes but it's worth clarifying.
Related questions
Related questions
Will wild-animal suffering be a mainstream moral issue by the beginning of 2100?
57% chance
Will Humans go extinct by 2200?
55% chance
If biological humans still exist in 2100, the majority of them will regard factory farming as a great evil of the past
68% chance
Will Humans become extinct in 2400?
58% chance
Will there be a year, before 2030, in which *net* AI suffering outweighs net 2022 farmed animal suffering?
32% chance
Will there be a year, before 2040, in which *net* AI suffering outweighs net 2022 farmed animal suffering?
53% chance
Will there be a year, before 2030, in which *total* AI suffering outweighs total 2022 farmed animal suffering?
29% chance
Complex communication with a non-human animal by 2050
34% chance
Will popular opinion in the U.S. be that factory farming is a moral atrocity by end of 2050?
70% chance
In 2068, will animal farming will be less than 10% of its size as of 2023?
67% chance