Wild-animal suffering will be a mainstream moral issue by 2100, conditional on biological humans still existing
21
1kṀ4302100
51%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
Copied over from Elicit
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
Sort by:
In a hypothetical post-singularity scenario where the vast majority of remaining habitat zones are administered by (or with the assistance of) a superintelligent AI for the purposes of ecosystem preservation/optimisation, do the animals in them still qualify as 'wild'? I assume yes but it's worth clarifying.
Related questions
Related questions
Will wild-animal suffering be a mainstream moral issue by the beginning of 2100?
54% chance
If biological humans still exist in 2100, the majority of them will regard factory farming as a great evil of the past
68% chance
Will humans be an endangered species by 2600?
45% chance
Will there be a year, before 2040, in which *net* AI suffering outweighs net 2022 farmed animal suffering?
53% chance
Will there be a year, before 2040, in which *total* AI suffering outweighs total 2022 farmed animal suffering?
12% chance
Will some factory farmed animals be made incapable of experiencing any physical or psychological suffering, by 2030?
15% chance
Will there be a year, before 2030, in which *net* AI suffering outweighs net 2022 farmed animal suffering?
32% chance
Will humans be an endangered species by 2200?
33% chance
Will there be a year, before 2030, in which *total* AI suffering outweighs total 2022 farmed animal suffering?
29% chance
Will meat from animals that have been bred to feel little or no suffering be commercially available by 2044?
19% chance