Wild-animal suffering will be a mainstream moral issue by 2100, conditional on biological humans still existing
21
126
Ṁ430Ṁ450
2100
51%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
Copied over from Elicit
Get Ṁ200 play money
Sort by:
In a hypothetical post-singularity scenario where the vast majority of remaining habitat zones are administered by (or with the assistance of) a superintelligent AI for the purposes of ecosystem preservation/optimisation, do the animals in them still qualify as 'wild'? I assume yes but it's worth clarifying.
Related questions
Related questions
Will wild-animal suffering be a mainstream moral issue by the beginning of 2100?
53% chance
Conditional on at least 8 degrees of global warming by 2100, will at least 1 billion people remain alive?
44% chance
Will popular opinion in the U.S. be that factory farming is a moral atrocity by end of 2050?
69% chance
Conditional on at least 3 degrees of global warming by 2100, will at least 1 billion people remain alive?
65% chance
Conditional on at least 5 degrees of global warming by 2100, will at least 1 billion people remain alive?
60% chance
Will there be a year, before 2040, in which *net* AI suffering outweighs net 2022 farmed animal suffering?
54% chance
Will there be a year, before 2030, in which *net* AI suffering outweighs net 2022 farmed animal suffering?
28% chance
Will Humans go extinct by 2200?
35% chance
Conditional on at least 10 degrees of global warming by 2100, will at least 1 billion people remain alive?
37% chance
Will Animal to Human translation be possible by 2050?
48% chance