Wild-animal suffering will be a mainstream moral issue by 2100, conditional on biological humans still existing
Plus
21
Ṁ4302100
51%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
Copied over from Elicit
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000and
3.00
1,0003.00Sort by:
In a hypothetical post-singularity scenario where the vast majority of remaining habitat zones are administered by (or with the assistance of) a superintelligent AI for the purposes of ecosystem preservation/optimisation, do the animals in them still qualify as 'wild'? I assume yes but it's worth clarifying.
Related questions
Related questions
Will wild-animal suffering be a mainstream moral issue by the beginning of 2100?
54% chance
If biological humans still exist in 2100, the majority of them will regard factory farming as a great evil of the past
68% chance
Will there be a year, before 2030, in which *total* AI suffering outweighs total 2022 farmed animal suffering?
29% chance
Complex communication with a non-human animal by 2050
50% chance
Will there be a year, before 2030, in which *net* AI suffering outweighs net 2022 farmed animal suffering?
32% chance
Will there be a year, before 2040, in which *net* AI suffering outweighs net 2022 farmed animal suffering?
53% chance
Will humans be an endangered species by 2200?
33% chance
Will humans be an endangered species by 2400?
41% chance
Will Humans go extinct by 2200?
59% chance
Will humans be an endangered species by 2300?
39% chance