As far as I can tell, Ukraine have been given vague permissions but still aren't allowed to strike air bases. The question is whether they get some kind of minimal viable permission.
Feel free to discuss in the comments to help us figure out what the resolution is.
Currently I'm gonna say, "are they allowed to strike military planes and airbases anywhere in russia."
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/17/us/politics/biden-ukraine-russia-atacms-missiles.html
"President Biden has authorized the first use of U.S.-supplied long-range missiles by Ukraine for strikes inside Russia, U.S. officials said."
"The officials said that while the Ukrainians were likely to use the missiles first against Russian and North Korean troops that threaten Ukrainian forces in Kursk, Mr. Biden could authorize them to use the weapons elsewhere."
I would resolve the question "Yes" if the US allows to use ATACMS in 300km range zone (grey area). I think it's the main restriction now. @NathanpmYoung
Can you clarify if this covers US manufactured weapons including those that have been on paper provided to Ukraine by other countries, such as UK or France; or is the question referring to US provided weapons.
Alternatively, we could do something like this
"If I saw strategic hard targets deep inside r*ssia being blown up using foreign missiles, such as factories, bridges, etc"
From https://twitter.com/Tame_E_Coyote
Looking at some articles like this:
it appears the restrictions are on
using US weapons
outside specified areas
So you would accept any broadening at all of the areas where US weapons may be used?