It is good, on balance, for EA funders to have seats on boards of orgs they fund [forum poll, resolves to %]
14
469
Ṁ290Ṁ270
resolved Jul 1
Resolved as
69%1D
1W
1M
ALL
This will resolve to the % of response that say Agree or Weakly agree in the poll embedded in this post in a month's time.
Get Ṁ200 play money
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ2 | |
| 2 | Ṁ2 | |
| 3 | Ṁ1 | |
| 4 | Ṁ1 | |
| 5 | Ṁ0 |
Sort by:
Related questions
Related questions
In 10 years, what % of the EA/adjacent community think, on balance that Wytham Abbey was a good use of money, compared to the other options at the time? (Buy yes to increase)
59% chance
Will >60% of EAs believe that "Pause AI" protests have been net positive in Q4 2025?
50% chance
Will >60% of EAs believe that "Pause AI" protests have been net positive in 2030?
44% chance
In 10 years, what % of the EA/adjacent community think, on balance that Wytham Abbey was a good use of money, compared to the other options?
72
Will the EA forum support users estimating values in posts and then supplying some kind of median, by 2030?
53% chance
Across, 2025 a majority of EA funding rounds will have public forecasting questions/prediction markets to bet on whether grants will be given or whether grant goals will be met.
23% chance
Will approval voting, quadratic funding, liquid democracy, etc, get $10m+ from EA funders before 2030?
53% chance
Will a significant portion of Jeff Bezos charitable projects be EA aligned?
19% chance
Will there be an EA organisation that donates >$1M/yr using a democratized mechanism before 2025?
30% chance
Will "EA orgs' legal structure inhibits risk taking..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
11% chance