people prefer less options.. ok, less work for developers [Manifold will be No1 in the world with that ask @grok is it true? feature]

oh i meant to vote 'as an option', i thought that's what yes implied

The last time someone tried this, it failed due to bad headlines

@nikki Tell me more.

I feel like having the option of such a feature could be neat! Perhaps it could be a mana sink -- you can pay a mana fee (to pay for compute time) to have an LLM judge your market once per hour/day/week/month and autoresolve it.

Yes, it will get it wrong sometimes. But it could be challenged by the holders.

On the other hand, I would not be much of a fan of users making fully automated AI generated market questions. Automating the resolution would just make that whole life cycle easier to automate. That would diminish the human spark of this site.

@Quroe and we can test-hack that AI, yes?

Manifold will be No1 in the world with that ask @grok is it true? feature

@MyDreamIsHere2018 I don't quite follow what you're saying here.

@Quroe manifold.markets may act a a test ground for inventing thise ai resolutions

@MyDreamIsHere2018 I'm considering the idea of setting up some sort of market that lets the AI autoresolve something non-arbitrary. I need to figure out the API a little more.

Can you define what you mean by, "as an option"?

@Quroe we have comments section for that

@Quroe you are as a creator may dedicate AI to autoresolve

@MyDreamIsHere2018 I interpret it to mean you can toggle the option. An on-off switch? Is that what you mean?

If so, this seems like it could be a good idea! There are so many dead, unresolved markets right now.

@Quroe exactly. But the question is also about whether AI can understand the creator’s intent and provide automated supplementary resolution