1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ81 | |
| 2 | Ṁ13 | |
| 3 | Ṁ9 | |
| 4 | Ṁ5 | |
| 5 | Ṁ4 |
People are also trading
Is the question whether an entity will claim that OpenAI released a model that was a copy or clone of said entity's? GPT is the product name OpenAI has given their specific LLMs.
As an example, if an entity (say Mistral) sues OpenAI claiming that GPT-4.5 is a full or partial copy of Mixtral8x7B, then this would resolve YES? And conversely, if OpenAI sued Mistral and claimed that Mixtral8x7B was a full or partial copy of GPT3.5, that wouldn't be a factor in this market?
Do you count claims that a model was trained using the outputs of one of the plaintiff's models? This isn't really a copy or clone, but may still appear in some allegations.
@Pykess Companies and individuals have been claiming that their GPTs are belong cloned and then released on the GPT marketplace. So, there are multiple copies of the same GPTs.
@MichaelLomuscio I see. You were referring to the GPT marketplace. Neither the title nor the description made that clear. OpenAI wouldn't really be "releasing" it then, no? It's just a third party's GPT on OpenAI's marketplace.
@Pykess The "they" in the title refers to the company, not to OpenAI.
Pronouns like this should often be avoided when speaking precisely, they're too ambiguous.