🏅 Top traders

I agree. Whatever "against AI" ever meant, it had to include this.

@MichaelLomuscio I feel like this being posted by Trump on his social media platform should count:

"This is A.I., and it is very dangerous for our Country! Also, I was never on Epstein’s Plane, or at his ‘stupid’ Island. Strong Laws ought to be developed against A.I. It will be a big and very dangerous problem in the future!”

He's pretty clearly criticizing AI.

@Arky Oh wow, if this market is just going by the title then yeah I think that probably qualifies.

@MichaelLomuscio you got any thoughts?

@Arky Man I nearly forgot his weird jumpy style.

@Arky

“Strong laws ought to be developed against A.I.” is about as clear of a stance as it gets.

I’m baffled by how low the probability of this market is.

please clarify resolution criteria

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/PiqVAKS85cI

RFK Jr., Democratic candidate for president, talks about what he would do to regulate AI

This is from last year, and he's now running as an independent, and it's unclear what "stance against AI" means, but other than that it seems to fit.

Is Will Hurd's AI policy plan "against AI" or for it?https://www.axios.com/2023/09/20/first-ai-plan-republican-primary

Also DeSantis has stated at different times that AI must be developed to compete against China, and also AI is a tool of "woke" companies. Does this count as "against AI"?https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/debates/republican-candidates-artificial-intelligence-stances/

What does it mean to be "against" AI? Wants it banned? Does not believe it exists? Restricting development? Wants to nationalize? What if their stance is it's a net plus but its uses need some regulation?

What counts as a candidate? Someone actually running in the general, or just someone competing in a primary?