The resolution condition for this would be that demonstrators or protestors are charged with hate speech on the sole premise of using the phrase, in any NATO country, or that a NATO country makes it clear that it is classified as hate speech and may alone result in a prosecution.
Evidence of this must be posted in the comments, or found with basic research online by myself.
Recently a member of the US congress was censured for using the term: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/comment/2023/11/08/rashida-tlaib-anti-semitism-israel-house-censure/
A british labour member of parliament was suspended for using the term in parliament:
And elon musk banned the term from twitter, saying it 'calls for genocide': https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/musk-from-the-river-to-the-sea-twitter-suspension-1234886216/
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ97 | |
| 2 | Ṁ42 | |
| 3 | Ṁ42 | |
| 4 | Ṁ39 |
People are also trading
removed accidental duplicate comment
https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/international/europe/1699528989-berlin-criminalizes-slogan-from-the-river-to-the-sea-palestine-will-be-free
Resolves yes I think, since Berlin is a region of a NATO country, and the prompt doesn't say it has to be banned in a whole country.
@LukeShadwell actions relating to a country can only apply to national government. If you said "any government" then it could apply to the smallest levels.
@mec It’s still under criminal prosecution within a nato country, under a law of the country as a whole, just classified as part of that law within that area
removed accidental duplicate comment