Short description
In the image below, there are two sets of points, green and red. One of them is "random" while another one has been produced by me via clicking points into the square. Market resolves to YES if the green one has been produced by me and NO otherwise.
All 100 points have now been revealed

Details
One of the point sets has been produced by sampling from a uniform distribution over a square. The length of this square is strictly less than the bounding box in the square above. Call this the Hidden Square. I won't tell you the side length of the Hidden Square.
Another of these point sets has been produced by sampling from me. Some details of the data generation process:
The points were generated by clicking a location in a UI interface on a mousepad.
I generated 100 points in roughly 90 seconds.
I have practiced.
If a point landed outside of the Hidden Square, I discarded that point and generated a new one.
I have applied one or several entropy-increasing transformations to the final point set.
To elaborate on the last point, here is a hypothetical example of such a transformation: "Given a point, round its x-coordinate to the nearest multiple of 10, and then add a uniformly random integer between 0-9 to it." Intuitively, this makes the set of points "more random", i.e. harder to distinguish from the "actually random set".
I won't tell which transformations I've used.
EDIT: Here are the transformations I used:
Reflect the points along the two perpendicular bisectors of the sides and one of the diagonals (giving 8 possible destinations for the point), in a uniformly random way.
Reveal the points in a random order, in a uniformly random way.
The length of the hidden square is 400 - 6*2, with the same center as the bounding box.
Other
Here is a market on how many points it will take for traders to figure out the answer: https://manifold.markets/Loppukilpailija/how-many-points-are-needed-to-disti-74e061c28bb6
The data
The data in a more convenient form. The bounding box in the image has corners at (100, 100) and (500, 500).
GREEN:
226 280
253 454
150 465
405 217
456 203
370 268
373 260
454 170
166 474
274 247
272 377
446 459
281 434
116 385
464 250
299 396
446 271
271 473
354 281
149 304
424 303
180 220
130 454
344 304
409 154
231 256
462 195
311 459
299 272
465 374
434 220
157 268
227 230
446 182
337 416
244 478
280 284
203 240
249 482
279 356
154 463
435 288
275 357
305 252
357 200
219 166
379 390
451 438
453 436
303 270
488 165
112 440
414 233
386 269
314 415
306 324
308 447
372 202
386 391
404 247
452 277
364 204
176 399
281 462
156 227
290 410
327 245
310 140
378 220
445 455
124 300
491 417
365 441
116 277
311 205
494 166
290 375
276 314
357 151
322 392
452 345
370 162
327 437
336 337
308 275
221 430
423 242
324 238
300 305
160 209
203 127
444 333
349 486
293 239
345 370
211 228
154 240
221 108
349 440
242 179
RED:
285 229
142 422
250 224
468 169
410 215
301 178
232 247
371 480
417 294
410 196
128 122
213 302
400 399
444 373
163 213
155 454
340 319
477 386
149 369
302 442
204 470
396 152
123 306
118 454
106 110
362 399
127 209
448 346
188 286
442 135
263 124
452 351
183 429
285 150
209 405
283 236
453 132
332 374
296 176
227 202
251 480
325 322
350 242
270 341
147 368
469 266
281 167
418 165
449 416
223 158
265 171
239 433
462 398
110 241
345 318
210 167
291 477
295 125
381 236
487 362
359 117
381 283
289 205
349 393
183 244
479 447
200 480
224 144
433 427
133 346
374 206
127 413
246 399
457 155
247 251
299 292
163 142
367 344
276 349
364 302
167 340
423 133
424 427
204 245
150 385
170 258
133 361
357 200
361 307
176 175
304 148
223 163
366 169
437 437
239 123
355 465
211 283
341 469
235 486
287 488
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ3,271 | |
2 | Ṁ1,945 | |
3 | Ṁ1,314 | |
4 | Ṁ1,050 | |
5 | Ṁ539 |