What is the most valuable proposition to know?
6
400Ṁ667
resolved Nov 23
ResolvedN/A
18%
Krantz can align humanity.
13%
If we could earn a living by interpretably arguing with a decentralized collective intelligence about what valuable truth is, we would acheive game theoretic futarchy.
13%
What it means for two intelligent agents to "be aligned" is what it means for two intelligent agents to "have zero variance between their confidences of every proposition they have ever thought of".
12%
If we simply allowed every real person to securely evaluate every interpretable fact and treated that data as money, all other problems could be solved instrumentally using that process.
11%
Krantz can decentrally align humanity while controlling disclosure and acheive game theoretic parity of rational agents.
7%
The universe is infinite.
6%
God exists.
5%
AI is going to wipe out humanity if we continue our current path
5%
Aliens are real.
4%
There’s more to life than AI alignment
3%Other
1.2%
Physical control is to reputational control as emotional control is to intellectual control.
1.1%
We control our path.

This prediction serves the value assignment function of the krantz demonstration mechanism.

https://manifold.markets/Krantz/krantz-mechanism-demonstration?r=S3JhbnR6

It will resolve when AI can provide a mechanistically interpretable proof of what proposition humanity assigns the highest value to the interpretable decentralized verification of.

It is not necessary for a given proposition to be true. Rather, the value assessed is the value of humanity collectively agreeing on any distinct confidence.

Please consider adding any propositions that you think are valuable to establish a consensus of confidence on (ideally to both predictions).

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

@KJW_01294 Thanks for participating! Don't forget to also add it to the demonstration mechanism. 😁

@Krantz oh right! Pardon, thanks

bought Ṁ10 NO

@Krantz no offense but it sounds like you just want to be the boot

@KJW_01294 No offense taken. I don't understand what you mean, but I would not like to be a boot.

Do I understand correctly that this roughly translates to "which statement will ASI prove would be voted the most important to know whether it's true or not by all of humanity"?

@TheAllMemeingEye Yes, roughly. I would replace "would be voted" to "has been voted".

@Krantz thanks 👍

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy