Each answer resolves to its side of most holders
20
210
220
May 31
74%
54 holders
68%
13 holders
52%
21 holders
52%
34 holders
Resolved
YES
2 holders
Resolved
YES
3 holders
Resolved
YES
8 holders

Options, which do not get enough holders on one side, resolve to NA at the closure.

The answer title shows how mich people must be on a single side for it to resolve.

I have bet 1 mana on each YES at the start to create the initial offset: one side becomes slightly more profitable, but the other becomes slightly more likely to win.

Get Ṁ200 play money
Sort by:
bought Ṁ200 8 holders YES

is resolution triggered by touching the holder #? i.e. if one of the holders drops off after hitting the target, does it still count?

this is a really fun one!

@simoj touching the number "immediately" resolves to the corresponding side, even if I am online much later when somebody already sold their position. But there has to be a screenshot, so I don't have to parse the Trades feed.

@KongoLandwalker what if someone parse it for you?

5 holders

Did you wait till there was 7 and an entierly different outcome???

@CyfralCoot

The answer title shows how mich people must be on a single side for it to resolve.

on a single side

5 holders
bought Ṁ10 5 holders NO

@KongoLandwalker Bots count right?

bought Ṁ125 3 holders YES

@KongoLandwalker 3 holders should resolve YES

bought Ṁ1 8 holders YES

I see it as democracy dumpfer. At start it is just a vote, but at some point newcomers and some holders see a mana incentive to vote the other way.