Each answer resolves to its side of most holders
Mini
31
2.3k
resolved Jun 1
Resolved
YES
8 holders
Resolved
YES
3 holders
Resolved
YES
2 holders
Resolved
50%
13 holders
Resolved
50%
21 holders
Resolved
50%
34 holders
Resolved
50%
54 holders
Resolved
NO
5 holders

Options, which do not get enough holders on one side, resolve to NA at the closure.

The answer title shows how mich people must be on a single side for it to resolve.

I have bet 1 mana on each YES at the start to create the initial offset: one side becomes slightly more profitable, but the other becomes slightly more likely to win.

Get Ṁ600 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ22
2Ṁ15
3Ṁ9
4Ṁ6
5Ṁ3
Sort by:
bought Ṁ15 54 holders YES

Due to the fact NA button was removed, corresponding markets will resolve to 50%.

reposted

Just 10 more holders on the NO side, and NO side would get 30x returns!

Make sure to make small bets to not reduce incentive for others to join the No side.

bought Ṁ200 8 holders YES

is resolution triggered by touching the holder #? i.e. if one of the holders drops off after hitting the target, does it still count?

this is a really fun one!

@simoj touching the number "immediately" resolves to the corresponding side, even if I am online much later when somebody already sold their position. But there has to be a screenshot, so I don't have to parse the Trades feed.

@KongoLandwalker what if someone parse it for you?

5 holders

Did you wait till there was 7 and an entierly different outcome???

@CyfralCoot

The answer title shows how mich people must be on a single side for it to resolve.

on a single side

5 holders
bought Ṁ10 5 holders NO

@KongoLandwalker Bots count right?

bought Ṁ125 3 holders YES

@KongoLandwalker 3 holders should resolve YES

bought Ṁ1 8 holders YES

I see it as democracy dumpfer. At start it is just a vote, but at some point newcomers and some holders see a mana incentive to vote the other way.