("Major tech company is referring to any company- Google,TikTok, Amazon, Facebook,etc. That uses AI)
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to evolve, its integration into daily life and decision-making processes becomes more profound. A major tech company has developed an advanced AI capable of predicting individual behaviors with unprecedented accuracy, leveraging vast amounts of data collected from users' online activities. This AI system's capabilities range from anticipating consumer purchasing decisions to predicting personal life choices, effectively blurring the lines between technological convenience and invasive surveillance.
This groundbreaking innovation, however, has raised significant concerns regarding individual privacy rights, data security, and the ethical use of AI. Critics argue that such predictive technologies infringe on personal freedoms and privacy, potentially leading to manipulation and unauthorized surveillance. Advocates for the technology highlight its potential to revolutionize marketing, enhance user experiences, and even predict and prevent crimes before they happen.
The question for the prediction market is: "By 2025, will this major tech company face legal action as a result of creating an AI that can predict individual behaviors based on online activity, thereby igniting a global debate over the balance between privacy and convenience?" This scenario delves into the heart of contemporary issues surrounding technology's role in society, the boundaries of privacy in the digital age, and the ethical implications of AI advancements. Participants are invited to speculate on the outcome of this legal and societal clash, considering the evolving regulatory landscapes, public sentiment towards privacy rights, and the relentless march of technological innovation.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ89 | |
| 2 | Ṁ8 | |
| 3 | Ṁ8 | |
| 4 | Ṁ7 | |
| 5 | Ṁ5 |
This does seem like it was written by an AI, but I'm chipping M10 in anyway because there is at least one lawsuit ongoing that I know about (although it's over copyright, not privacy.)
I am confident if I looked there are more. There are legal actions in Europe against the tech giants over privacy (GDPR compliance) and surveillance through video where AI is used to pick a person out of the crowd, abd the right to be forgotten. So I'm pretty sure I could find an example that would resolve this yes, but before I do, I want to know there's a human who has some specific criteria I can meet to resolve this yes.
@equinoxhq yeah I use chat gpt to flush out certain things bc my typing is shit. I'll update the question with specifics
@Kittenqueen57 You can hit the little microphone button on Chatgpt, and say things and it will type them out in the question box. Then copy and paste into wherever. This way, your text will be your own words, but no typing. :)
@equinoxhq smartass lol, what I (obviously) meant was that I end up word vomiting when I try to explain what I mean until it's a senseless ramble and there is no relevance or cohesiveness at all I can write things down better but this app is a game not something I am going to spend hours writing and then typing for. It'll be a learning process for sure but I think you can handle something being written by AI. I promise it won't kill you. But I do apologize about the question being invalid from the start. Quite frankly I was stoned asf looking through manifold and thought I had a crazy good market idea so I had chat gpt flesh it out for me and boom didn't think about it for a day or so and upon realizing my question was invalid because it has already happened. I made sure everyones position was YES and resolved YES.
@Kittenqueen57 It wasn't obvious to me that when you said your typing sucked what you meant was you struggle to express yourself. There are people who are slow typers, and voice to text transcription has only very recently become good enough that no-cost options exist to help with this. I was trying to be helpful based on the information I had.
It won't kill me to read some AI generated text, sure, but trying to have a back and forth conversation with a market creator that is a bot would be a waste of time, so I wanted to clarify whether this market was created by a human or a bot, before I went searching for information that might convince a human to resolve a market.
@equinoxhq that's fair, I'm relatively new to manifold. And I see I didn't clarify much at first. Apologies 🫴✨🩵
I see chatgpt wrote the description for you. What it failed to mention is the resolution criteria. New York Times is already suing openai if I remember correctly, what would need to happen for the market to resolve Yes? Suit going to court? Tech company losing the lawsuit? How will you resolve the market if a settlement is agreed upon?
@ProjectVictory you are correct, and the criteria I had in mind has already been met so the question stood as invalid. Wich is why I resolved yes. Also, nobody lost money so no one got hurt.