Resolution criteria

This market resolves to YES if, prior to the date of the 2026 midterm elections, a recognized national Democratic Party official (e.g., a member of the DNC leadership, a sitting Democratic Senator, or a sitting Democratic House Representative) or the official Democratic Party communications apparatus refers to a specific "$1.776 billion dollar" allocation or fund as the "Epstein Loyalty Fund" in a public statement, press release, or verified social media post.

Otherwise, this market resolves to NO.

Resolution will be based on credible reporting from major news outlets or official government records. If the term is used in a context that clearly refers to a different entity or is used ironically by a critic rather than as a formal designation by a Democrat, it does not count.

Background

The term "slush fund" is frequently used in political discourse to describe discretionary government spending that critics argue lacks sufficient oversight or is used for partisan political gain. The specific figure of $1.776 billion is occasionally referenced in political debates regarding federal appropriations, though there is no widely recognized legislative fund currently known by the moniker "Epstein Loyalty Fund." This market tracks whether this specific label gains traction within Democratic political messaging leading up to the midterms.

Or, will their messaging continue to be horrible? Enjoy.

This description was generated by AI. Review and verify everything here yourself. You can edit, replace, or delete any part of this description, including the resolution criteria. You do not need to trust the AI output.