Will anyone try to take credit for nuking LessWrong?
Basic
15
Ṁ337resolved Oct 5
Resolved
NO1D
1W
1M
ALL
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000
and3.00
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ23 | |
2 | Ṁ21 | |
3 | Ṁ9 | |
4 | Ṁ9 | |
5 | Ṁ8 |
Sort by:
@MartinRandall Good question. I was only thinking of the second press when I created this market, but counting either press is more consistent with the description-as-written. So taking credit for either press counts.
Related questions
Related questions
Will "Accidentally Load Bearing" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
40% chance
Will LessWrong still be meaningfully active in 2030? *
86% chance
Will "Assume Bad Faith" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
29% chance
Will "Fact Finding: Attempting to Reverse-Engineer ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
46% chance
Will "Assume Bad Faith" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
29% chance
Will "Carl Sagan, nuking the moon, and not nuking t..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance
By the end of 2024, will any LessWrong, EA, or Alignment forum post with at least 100 upvotes be revealed to have been written by an AI?
21% chance
Will LessWrong still be meaningfully active in 2026? *
92% chance
Will LessWrong have book review on some newly-added source to Wikipedia rationality-related articles?
56% chance
Will "OpenAI: Fallout" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
15% chance