
Will LessWrong still be meaningfully active in 2026? *
10
170Ṁ3072027
95%
chance
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
If it's unambigious, resolves to that. If ambiguous, I'll ask people who are/were active on lesswrong which way they think it should resolve and resolve based on that.
This requires not just a few people posting every so often, or a lot of spam - it requires some sense of community and frequent high quality discussion, somewhat similar to what exists today.
I think the very vague criteria for this are fine, and anything more specific would probably just diverge from the spirit, but i'm curious if anyone has the other opinion.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get
1,000 to start trading!
People are also trading
Related questions
Will LessWrong still be meaningfully active in 2030? *
86% chance
Will "LessOnline (May 31—June 2, Berkeley, CA)" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
2% chance
Will "2024 Unofficial LessWrong Census/Survey" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
4% chance
Will "2023 Survey Results" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
2% chance
Will "2023 in AI predictions" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
11% chance
Will "Without fundamental advances, misalignment an..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
50% chance
Will "What o3 Becomes by 2028" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
19% chance
Will "What Goes Without Saying" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
31% chance
Will "Optimistic Assumptions, Longterm Planning, an..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
34% chance
Will "Lsusr's Rationality Dojo" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
17% chance