Resolves to the first person other than people listed below, who was banned in 2022.
If the person is only banned from making markets and commenting, that still counts.
If multiple people are banned at roughly the same time, I may resolve to all of them rather than just the first one.
If someone was banned, but no one has brought it to my attention by commenting on this market by the time the market resolved, that should not count as an incorrect resolution.
Previously banned (not necessarily in chronological order):
@EnopoletusHarding: /SneakySly/who-will-be-the-first-user-banned-f
@HieronymusBosch: /LivInTheLookingGlass/who-will-be-the-second-user-banned
@Accountdeletionrequested (wasabi says they were technically banned rather than deleted, because account deletion didn't exist yet)
@wasabipesto points out that @Accountdeletionrequested was technically banned because account deletion was not implemented at that point. And @AstrologerPranavShastri was also banned. This makes one or more of the previous resolutions incorrect. How should I handle this situation?
@Yev I don't think Accountdeletionrequested was banned? Manifold admins doing a manual delete is different from a ban.
I guess AstrologerPranavShastri being banned means the title count is wrong, but that's no big deal. You could just change the question to who will be the next user banned between Nov 11 and Dec 31
@jack I think banning from posting and/or creating markets should count. I'm not actually sure there is any other kind of ban.