Resolves on news reports from at least one of:
• ABC
• CBS
• NBC
• PBS
• NPR
• CNN
• Fox
• MSNBC
• Associated Press
• New York Times
• Washington Examiner
• Wall Street Journal
• New York Post
• USA Today
Update 2025-02-03 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Stake Clarification:
Any stake in an asset qualifies for inclusion regardless of the stake percentage.
Full acquisition is not required.
Update 2025-02-03 (PST): - Resolution Timeline: The market will resolve by the end of 2025. (AI summary of creator comment)
Update 2025-02-03 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Fund Not Created Resolution:
If the U.S. sovereign wealth fund is not created, the market resolves as N/A.
Update 2025-02-04 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Clarification on Indirect Holdings:
ETFs as Single Assets: ETFs will be treated as a single asset, and the underlying individual stocks in an ETF will not qualify as being held directly.
Direct Ownership Requirement: Only direct stakes in assets count towards the resolution criteria, even if the asset is part of a broader index or fund.
Update 2025-02-04 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Direct Stake Requirement Update:
Any stake in the individual asset qualifies for inclusion.
Stakes held as part of group funds do not count toward the resolution criteria.
1,000People are also trading
@creator Does this have to be direct, or does indirect count as well? e.g. If it buys an S&P 500 fund, would all the stocks in the S&P 500 resolve YES?
@DanielTilkin Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) would not resolve YES for the individual stocks in the funds.
@jim well, I am refusing the tin foil hat and assume this won't be taken to it's logical conclusion... but it were, at the limit is some real Revelations shit (pardon my french)
some real Revelations shit
@JussiVilleHeiskanen Can you elaborate? This is one thing that we can probably mostly agree on, but I'd expected most liberals to be relatively supportive of this idea.
@skibidist well horizontal integration could be seen as the beast ... btb not liberal though co-belligerent on some issues.
@JussiVilleHeiskanen OK this is really bad. Of course Democrats won't make it a wedge issue because taking things from people and giving them to bureaucrats is their whole raison d'etre
President Trump on February 3 signed an executive order directing the creation of a U.S. sovereign wealth fund, with plans to establish it within the next year. The fund's creation requires funding mechanisms, investment strategies, and governance models to be developed over the coming 90 days by the Treasury and Commerce Departments. The establishment of the fund then needs Congressional approval.
If the fund is not created, this entire market resolves N/A.