Articles of impeachment have been filed.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-resolution/143/text/ih?overview=closed&format=xml

@JeffBerman I haven't read a lot of articles of impeachment. Do they always look like this?

@WilliamGunn It's a little short, but yeah, pretty much.

@WilliamGunn That's an interesting observation. This is legit, though. congress.gov

@Marnix I guess I naïvely expected at least some attempt at argumentation and citing of prior caselaw. Am I missing something or does the argument here come down to "lots of people voted for me, therefore opposing me is a crime"?

@WilliamGunn Or one could just as easily say “This judge is way outside his authority, but he’s slowing down Trump, so he can rule however he likes.”

@JeffBerman If one were to engage in partisan rhetoric, yes. I'm more trying to understand what's actually happening than whose side benefits.

@WilliamGunn Yes, I hear you. Of course, rhetoric sounds partisan only when it comes from the opposing point of view. I guess we’ll hear the arguments once it gets into the House.

@JeffBerman I see the distinction between partisan and non-partisan as one of intent - is it trying to persuade or inform. Partisans often try to disguise themselves, sure, but not every argument is partisan. Distinguishing the two is a real exercise in wise judgment, particularly given that one must recognize the way one's own mind filters experience.

Anyways, yes, I hope we do see arguments and not just a further iteration of more impeachment of those who dare to present an opposing view.