Manifold Team March Retro: What could have gone better?
8
515Ṁ247resolved Apr 2
14%14%
Spikes in database usage routinely make for a bad user experience
12%10%
ND1 ~flat despite efforts
12%10%
Partner program hasn't brought in many new creators
10%9%
Low politics vertical usage
10%9%
Bet panel Yes/No outcome switcher is missed
10%9%
No major politics sponsorships/deals/promos
10%8%
Numeric markets taking a while and not obviously on track
7%8%
Pathos scam
6%4%
Buying the gold checkmark on X was not worth it
6%3%
progress on migration
2%1.7%
Vercel revalidation still erroring frequently
15%Other
Where did we drop the ball? The point of this isn't to point fingers or assign blame, but rather to identify where our processes and strategy are not serving us well.
This time, I will actually resolve the market to a rough approximation of what I think actually didn't go well. Place your bets!
Last time: https://manifold.markets/JamesGrugett/manifold-team-feb-retro-what-could
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ3 | |
| 2 | Ṁ3 |