Manifold Team Jan/Q4 Retro: What could have gone better?
18
1.5kṀ948resolved Mar 5
13%9%
Velocity of core product improvements significantly slowed
11%15%
The number of user interviews we did 😭
9%7%
Slow roll out of politics site
8%6%
Decision to try to hire to lead politics instead of doing it faster with a founder
8%12%
No significant growth events in Jan
8%6%
Overly expensive outreach initiatives
8%6%
Manifold Community Fund not that effective per time spent
7%9%
manifold love usage
6%5%
Bet on love time consuming
6%4%
neglect of improving onboarding experience
4%3%
Bet UI revamp took a while and still looks complex
4%3%
Making some of our users really upset less often when it could have been avoided
4%3%
Not focused enough on product
2%1.5%
Manifold love ads not helpful
2%1.3%
buggy scheduler
1%0.7%
Initial plan for Politics
3%
Not prioritizing Supabase Migration Process
5%Other
Where did we drop the ball? The point of this isn't to point fingers or assign blame, but rather to identify where our processes and strategy are not serving us well.
This time, I will actually resolve the market to a rough approximation of what I think actually didn't go well. Place your bets!
Last time: https://manifold.markets/JamesGrugett/manifold-team-q3-retro-what-could-h
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ25 | |
| 2 | Ṁ13 | |
| 3 | Ṁ6 | |
| 4 | Ṁ3 | |
| 5 | Ṁ2 |