
Lately several of my markets have had contested resolutions due to ambiguities in the description. I'm implimenting a bounty system to try to head off these problems in the future.
Anyone can point out a potential ambiguity in a market description and suggest a change. If I accept that change, and then it turns out that that part of the descrption mattered, I'll send you M$50.
(You must have done this proactivly. Letting me know about an ambiguity after it's already caused a problem doesn't count.)
I'll post any bounties paid out so far in the comments here to keep count. However I won't be tracking every change to a market description that someone recommends to me, so such a change becoming relevant is on you to let me know about if I don't notice myself. (If you make your suggestion in the comments on that market, that'll leave a clear record and be easiest to find later.)
I'll ignore any suggestions where someone intentionally manipulated a market into a point of ambiguity in order to get that suggestion to matter, and similar situations.
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ87 | |
2 | Ṁ83 | |
3 | Ṁ62 | |
4 | Ṁ62 | |
5 | Ṁ31 |