🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ17 | |
| 2 | Ṁ2 | |
| 3 | Ṁ0 |
People are also trading
@Stralor No idea. There are only 3 traders besides Isaac and me, one of them Joshua, maybe he knows? Anyways, I'm probably the only one with guaranteed win from either resolving binary or multiple-choice, and I'd say: Not worth the trouble, just n/a.
@Primer [
{
"total": 2580837,
"outcome_type": "BINARY"
},
{
"total": 0,
"outcome_type": "BOUNTIED_QUESTION"
},
{
"total": 2594,
"outcome_type": "DATE"
},
{
"total": 677285,
"outcome_type": "MULTIPLE_CHOICE"
},
{
"total": 7302,
"outcome_type": "MULTI_NUMERIC"
},
{
"total": 5876,
"outcome_type": "NUMBER"
},
{
"total": 128791,
"outcome_type": "POLL"
},
{
"total": 15444,
"outcome_type": "PSEUDO_NUMERIC"
},
{
"total": 0,
"outcome_type": "QUADRATIC_FUNDING"
},
{
"total": 69656,
"outcome_type": "STONK"
}
]
@Primer Alright here are the listed markets with the most traders ever (resolved and open; closed is much tinier)
(ugh I see embedding images on the android app is still finicky after years. I'll post the text instead)
US Pres 2024 (Dependent) - 8.3k <- closed Nov 2024
LK-99 (Binary) - 6.6k <- closed Jan 1 2025
AI High Quality Movie 2028 (Binary) - 4.1k <- Open
Andrew Tate Sex Trafficking (Binary) - 3.4k <- Open
I remember all of these in 2024 before I left the site, so they crossed that threshold into 2025. The close dates allow us to easily disregard the two currently open markets. The question is: does the market need to have been open for trading at resolution time? Unspecified here.
@ian ah I see you've arrived! I think thats the resolution I was coming to but your data is off. What market has 100ks or 1Ms of traders? I think that's trades, or total traders? (but then the 0s dont make sense)
@Stralor yeah @IsaacKing can weigh in if he wants. Now that I read the title more closely I think he might've meant which singular market, but I'm not sure
@Stralor For what it's worth: I traded on the assumption: At end of 2024, I look at open markets with the largest number of traders. Resolves to the type of the #1 market.
@ian yeah and I read it as which market without an "ever" qualifier. ambiguous, but I'm happy with leaving it resolved MC. it's the literal interpretation