Many articles with a blatant left-wing bias have been mentioned over at /Joshua/what-wikipedia-articles-will-i-judg

According to Wikipedia, this is an unfair characterization:

In a 2023 interview with Lex Fridman, when asked if Wikipedia has a left-leaning bias, Wales said that:

Yeah, so I don't think so, not broadly. And I think you can always point to specific entries and talk about specific biases, but that's part of the process of Wikipedia. Anyone can come and challenge and to go on about that. But I see fairly often on Twitter, some quite extreme accusations of bias. And I think actually I don't see it. I don't buy that. And if you ask people for an example, they normally struggle and depending on who they are and what it's about. So it’s certainly true that some people who have quite fringe viewpoints and who knows the full rush of history in 500 years, they might be considered to be pathbreaking geniuses. But at the moment, quite fringe views. And they're just unhappy that Wikipedia doesn’t report on their fringe views as being mainstream. And that, by the way, goes across all kinds of fields.

So surely there should be equally many examples of right-wing bias.