It will be [credibly] reported or claimed that some of the board members who voted against Sam Altman's leadership were directly influenced by the output of software/AI/LLM systems. For example, they asked about, or were told by some LLM (including via intermediaries) that Sam should be removed, or persuaded to this effect, or bribed.

Basically, will there be [credible] reporting that AIs kicked Sam Altman out.

By mid 2024

credible = this is highly subjective. I will use my best judgment. It can't just be a single nutty professor who's got tenure and doesn't publish. It has to be some kind of real jourlistic thing, and also not be immediately disproven or withdrawn. It can also be a high credibility individual person of legitimate fame (via their creations, work, etc.)