An explosion hit Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital on October 17th.
This will resolve YES if the Israel Air Force or a credible* third party investigates and reports that the Israel Air Force struck the hospital, whether or not it was deliberate. It'll resolve NO if a credible* investigation concludes that it wasn't an airstrike. It'll resolve N/A if there's no such investigation; if investigations aren't conclusive; or if multiple investigations come to contradictory findings and none seem especially credible.
I'll extend the closing date if I know of any credible* investigations still in the works.
*Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and B'Tzelem are credible enough to me. UNHRC, UNRWA, and other UN bodies aren't, but would still count if their investigations seem uncharacteristically credible. Investigations by major western media outlets like NYT, BBC, CBC, and Washington Post would count too, but routine news articles don't.
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ207 | |
| 2 | Ṁ163 | |
| 3 | Ṁ82 | |
| 4 | Ṁ67 | |
| 5 | Ṁ54 |
At this point there's been multiple investigations finding it was likely a rocket. BBC 4 has suggested an airburst, but munitions experts contacted by BBC Verify and other outfits have contradicted that. Al Jazeera has suggested an Iron Dome missile, which would resolve this market NO regardless.