Which riders will be announced for Alpecin-Deceuninck for the 2025 season?
7
390Ṁ3492
resolved Dec 31
Resolved
YES
Silvan Dillier
Resolved
YES
Michael Gogl
Resolved
YES
Samuel Gaze
Resolved
YES
Mathieu van der Poel
Resolved
YES
Jasper Philipsen
Resolved
YES
Kaden Groves
Resolved
NO
Soren Kragh Andersen
Resolved
NO
Axel Laurance
Resolved
NO
Senne Leysen
Resolved
NO
Jason Osborne

Basic question: Which riders will be announced as riders for the 2025 season with Alpecin-Deceuninck?

ANNOUNCED. Not signed. Not "wait til they actually ride". This resolves on announcements.

If the team merges, changes sponsor, whatever, this probably still covers the new team. If it is obvious that it should not cover the new team, we can talk about what to do then. If they cease to exist, things will probably resolve No instead of N/A.

For riders on the 2024 roster:

If the team announces an extension publicly for the 2025 season (or longer), resolves Yes promptly. If it is common knowledge that they will ride for the team or have a 2025 contract, that is not enough to resolve yes. It has to be an announcement of a new, longer contract. Example: If Kooij announces an extension to 2027, he resolves Yes promptly.

If a different team announces a signing for 2025, resolves No promptly.

If there is no announcement about 2025, we're going to wait until the UCI website or team otherwise confirms they are on the 2025 squad.


For riders not on the 2024 roster (transfers in):

Resolves Yes if the team announces a signing. Resolves No if some other team announces a signing.

If there is an announcement that would lead to a prompt Yes or No resolution, but there is doubt about the claim or people are unsure of it for some reason, we can wait until it is more clear, even as long as the UCI website or official team roster for 2025. Example: Team accidentally announces on social media then immediately retracts --> Don't resolve yet. Example: Visma claims they signed Cian and Bora immediately counter-claims he's still for them --> Don't resolve yet. (If it resolves before the report is retracted, then a new answer can be created but it will not be unresolved.)

If some rider resolves Yes or No based on the criteria, and then new info comes out that puts that rider in question again, we can add a new option for that player, but we are not going to re-resolve or unresolve the earlier one. For example, if we had resolved Cian Yes for Bora 2024, and then there was word he might be leaving, we would not unresolve that, we would create a new answer for Cian.

  • Update 2024-31-12 (PST): - If the UCI website does not provide sufficient information, an alternative source will be used to confirm rider announcements. (AI summary of creator comment)

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ27
2Ṁ7
3Ṁ7
4Ṁ2
5Ṁ2
Sort by:

The UCI website is almost blank for these guys so I am using a different source.

bought Ṁ50 NO

BIG NEWS

Yeah, I saw that yesterday, exciting.

bought Ṁ50 YES

Ciro claims he will extend...

bought Ṁ1,000 YES

@Lion now Jasper should definitely stay

@egroj I feel like there is still a chance that the UAE will sign him. The've the money and the connections and he has ridden there before. And he would be a match with Pogi as well. (And they don't trashtalk him.) But I feel like 75% for him staying at ADC is fine.


© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules