Which riders will be announced for Team dsm-firmenich PostNL for the 2025 season?
Basic
6
Ṁ3058
resolved Dec 31
Resolved
YES
Romain Bardet
Resolved
YES
John Degenkolb
Resolved
YES
Bram Welten
Resolved
YES
Romain Combaud
Resolved
YES
Nils Eekhoff
Resolved
YES
Julius van den Berg
Resolved
YES
Casper van Uden
Resolved
YES
Niklas Markl
Resolved
YES
Sean Flynn
Resolved
YES
Fabio Jakobsen
Resolved
YES
Warren Barguil
Resolved
YES
Max Poole
Resolved
YES
Kevin Vermaerke
Resolved
YES
Oscar Onley
Resolved
YES
Pavel Bittner
Resolved
NO
Emils Liepins
Resolved
NO
Martijn Tusveld
Resolved
NO
Patrick Bevin

Basic question: Which riders will be announced as riders for the 2025 season with Team dsm-firmenich PostNL?

ANNOUNCED. Not signed. Not "wait til they actually ride". This resolves on announcements.

If the team merges, changes sponsor, whatever, this probably still covers the new team. If it is obvious that it should not cover the new team, we can talk about what to do then. If they cease to exist, things will probably resolve No instead of N/A.

For riders on the 2024 roster:

If the team announces an extension publicly for the 2025 season (or longer), resolves Yes promptly. If it is common knowledge that they will ride for the team or have a 2025 contract, that is not enough to resolve yes. It has to be an announcement of a new, longer contract. Example: If Kooij announces an extension to 2027, he resolves Yes promptly.

If a different team announces a signing for 2025, resolves No promptly.

If there is no announcement about 2025, we're going to wait until the UCI website or team otherwise confirms they are on the 2025 squad.


For riders not on the 2024 roster (transfers in):

Resolves Yes if the team announces a signing. Resolves No if some other team announces a signing.

If there is an announcement that would lead to a prompt Yes or No resolution, but there is doubt about the claim or people are unsure of it for some reason, we can wait until it is more clear, even as long as the UCI website or official team roster for 2025. Example: Team accidentally announces on social media then immediately retracts --> Don't resolve yet. Example: Visma claims they signed Cian and Bora immediately counter-claims he's still for them --> Don't resolve yet. (If it resolves before the report is retracted, then a new answer can be created but it will not be unresolved.)

If some rider resolves Yes or No based on the criteria, and then new info comes out that puts that rider in question again, we can add a new option for that player, but we are not going to re-resolve or unresolve the earlier one. For example, if we had resolved Cian Yes for Bora 2024, and then there was word he might be leaving, we would not unresolve that, we would create a new answer for Cian.

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ189
2Ṁ82
3Ṁ36
4Ṁ24
Sort by:
bought Ṁ352 NO

Resolving based on UCI website. Several riders had announcements by the team that were NOT reflected on the UCI website so I resolved those Yes also. The UCI website is often...wrong....

Is anyone confident enough to buy dsm riders above 85%? 🤣

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules