🏅 Top traders

So does it resolve now, or only when the Eagles eventually lose?

@MattLashofSullivan I think this should resolve now in my opinion, as the eagles have no way of losing earlier than SFnow, no? @DavidHandel

@rednamlooc What if the Eagles go undefeated?

@JoshuaWilkes Like forever you mean? Till the end of time? (Or the end of the NFL for that matter)

Cus it isn't limited to this season anywhere, so...

@rednamlooc maybe take a second look at the title?

@JoshuaWilkes oh, my bad, sorry. Just looked at the description. You are right.

If you read it literally, we might need to wait. Although the question is, whether that is according to the spirit of the question. (Also does "this season" include postseason?)

@rednamlooc agree it's not in the spirit of the question...there's no reason for the wait other than to just get more people trading on the market

@rednamlooc This isn't a 'spirit of the question' situation though. Last to lose their first game has a very specific and different meaning from going undefeated.

Whether the post season is included is a question for the creator, but in the absence of clarifying information it should be included

I see that @DavidHandel clarified in the comments that he meant 'undefeated the longest'. Now he will have to choose whether to honour the question or the comment.

This is why people *must* update the description when clarifying in comments 🥶

@JoshuaWilkes rather an academic question now

You may wish to further clarify what happens today if both SF and PHL lose as SF game is five hours after PHL game and seems a bit arbitrary to have a winner just on the schedule. Put differently, does each team need to have played same number of games to determine bet winners?

@AndrewReeves I think at this point most bettors will have already factored that schedule delay into their positions

Is it which one will be last to lose a game or which one will lose first (question vs description)?

@rednamlooc Which team will remain undefeated the longest?

@DavidHandel Apologies for the ambiguous wording.

@DavidHandel No problem ;)