Resolves yes if any of the following happen:
Ragequits
Creates new acc
Starts using alt acc instead of @IsaacKing as primary
Stays away from manifold for >=3 days out of next 7 on primary account
Threatens to rage quit (or non-rage normal quit)
Resolves NO otherwise.
Ragequit: no (to the best of my knowledge)
Isaac created a new account: check
Started using alt as primary: check
stays away from manifold (except to protect the streak) : check
Threatens to ragequit: no (to the best of my knowledge)
Thanks to @Mira for pointing these out, thanks to @firstuserhere for the reminder to resolve.
Since it would resolve YES if any of the criteria matched, and we've got multiple of the criteria matched, I'm resolving it as YES.
@Char #2 and #3 did not occur. That alt account has existed for months, and I'm not using it as my primary account; it explicitly says in its profile what situations it's for.
And you already said below that #4 isn't sufficient to resolve this to YES.
@BenjaminIkuta Inactive on main. And he transferred money to @IsaacKing2 , which is an alt account for trading and creating markets i.e. a new primary account. And that one's inactive too. And there was a market that I can't find(probably unlisted since) about "Will I prefer spending time in the MtG community over manifold?", which is a threat to non-rage normal quit.
So we have like 4/5 of the criteria being met.
@IsaacKing how much is that streak? And yes that's the point. It would cost a lot, like all the investment in Whales v minnows market (not just mana, but time + energy + stress etc combined)
@IsaacKing I agree but you may use some other acc to still do manifolding but just less controversially
@Char My point is that this market is likely to resolve YES without any change in behavior from me, so it's not actually asking what the title claims it's asking.
@Char reduced activity is understandable after so much intense back to back weeks of The market and now this