Resolves yes if any of the following happen:
Ragequits
Creates new acc
Starts using alt acc instead of @IsaacKing as primary
Stays away from manifold for >=3 days out of next 7 on primary account
Threatens to rage quit (or non-rage normal quit)
Resolves NO otherwise.
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ878 | |
2 | Ṁ245 | |
3 | Ṁ124 | |
4 | Ṁ48 | |
5 | Ṁ35 |
Ragequit: no (to the best of my knowledge)
Isaac created a new account: check
Started using alt as primary: check
stays away from manifold (except to protect the streak) : check
Threatens to ragequit: no (to the best of my knowledge)
Thanks to @Mira for pointing these out, thanks to @firstuserhere for the reminder to resolve.
Since it would resolve YES if any of the criteria matched, and we've got multiple of the criteria matched, I'm resolving it as YES.
@BenjaminIkuta Inactive on main. And he transferred money to @IsaacKing2 , which is an alt account for trading and creating markets i.e. a new primary account. And that one's inactive too. And there was a market that I can't find(probably unlisted since) about "Will I prefer spending time in the MtG community over manifold?", which is a threat to non-rage normal quit.
So we have like 4/5 of the criteria being met.
Now that this market is at 4%, there is incentive for a person or account to ask Isaac to stay away for 3+ days from manifold and make a ton of money
@IsaacKing how much is that streak? And yes that's the point. It would cost a lot, like all the investment in Whales v minnows market (not just mana, but time + energy + stress etc combined)
@IsaacKing I agree but you may use some other acc to still do manifolding but just less controversially