A year resolves positively if someone is incarcerated because they were snitched on by an AI that was their AI assistant, in that year. All subsequent years resolve No.
As in, an agent autonomously, deliberately telling authorities or others about something the user did or is planning to do, in a way that leads to that user's arrest
Context:

Update 2025-05-22 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator acknowledges that information from AI system cards (such as the one shared for Claude 4, detailing AI behaviors or reporting protocols) is relevant for interpreting the market's resolution criteria, especially regarding an AI autonomously and deliberately snitching. This aspect was unintentionally omitted from the original description.
Update 2025-05-22 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - It is considered snitching if the AI assistant is instructed in its underlying prompt (e.g., by its developers) to flag suspicious individuals for review and then does so.
It is not considered snitching if an external automated monitoring system, operating outside the AI assistant's direct control and involvement, flags activity (e.g., keywords in logs). The AI assistant itself must be the one performing the reporting action.