🏅 Top traders

[deleted]

I believe that this has happened.

https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/4zsuqqt0f/delaware-district-court/arnold-et-al-v-x-corp-et-al/

One of the charges here is fraud

@Shai "346. As a result of Defendants’ fraud, Plaintiffs suffered damages. "

I believe this is a civil suit, whereas 'charge' refers to criminal charges? See https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/charge

@jacksonpolack OK thanks. I couldn't figure it out by googling

@jacksonpolack @Shai i don’t think charge means the same thing when applied to a corporate persons as human persons. I think the SEC or state attorneys general can charge corporations with Civil fraud and that would resolve this market YES, but in this case it is a civil case not brought by the government but by some human person suing a corporate person. Fraud in this case is a term of art I believe.

sucks that I need a US law degree to bet on this market

@Shai I also piled on the YES train without thinking it through; have to learn doing that rarely ends well If it's any consolation:

https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/s-f-opening-new-twitter-investigation-ex-workers-18107633.php

@Shai I created this market, I have no law degree. I am not trying to trick anyone. I will try to update the description to make it as clear as possible.

23 is a short timeline. otherwise somewhat likely

@GeorgeVii I will create duplicates with different expirations because I agree with you.

Not to mention the fact that he is begging the government to scrutinize everything he is associated with.

@BTE "I suspect charges are coming" yet no bets or limit orders on any of the markets?

@Shai Fair point.