Did Avi Loeb just find alien technology in the Pacific Ocean?
53
527
980
Jul 2
2%
chance
Get Ṁ200 play money
Sort by:

Interesting market

predicts YES

@AviLoeb Is this the real Avi Loeb?

predicts YES

@BTE ?יש עוד

@BTE nah

predicts YES

@NicoDelon Shame. He does so many obscure podcasts I could see him possibly joining. You quickly debunked him though.

That would have been rad and I’m still not absolutely 100% sure it’s not him, but if it’s him he’s behaving weirdly. @colorednoise said they emailed him at his Harvard address and he denied it was him.

bought Ṁ50 of YES

He said today more than five different labs are analyzing the samples and the initial results show it is alien technology and not just a meteor. He said it would take about a month for them to publish the findings.

bought Ṁ20 of NO

my prior on aliens having visited earth is extremely low, as is my trust in anything avi loeb says

@blackle Avi's objects of concern are less visitors, and more just stray probes, thin, cheap, lacking propulsion. Still baffling if true though.

predicts YES

@makoyass This is correct. A probe would resolve this YES. I am thinking about ways to judge the quality of his evidence. I think we should set a minimum sigma. We aren't confirming Higgs-Boson so six sigma isn't necessary, but should be at least >2 probably. Any statisticians in the fold?

predicts NO

@BTE as a statistician, I see no way the evidence for this kind of claim could be converted to "sigma" in any reasonable/defensible/unambiguous way. Most likely any evidence would be primarily qualitative ("see, it has this weird structure under electron microscope", "it contains molecules we haven't seen naturally ocurring before", ...). Converting such claims to a numerical summary would usually require a ton of hard-to-verify assumptions and the impact of the specific assumptions on the reported "sigma" would be larger than any signal in the data.

Does the object have to be provably created by an intelligent non-human species? Or just be extra-terrestrial?

bought Ṁ10 of YES

Loeb seems to clearly think there is a much larger piece of the object still there on the ocean floor.