
Increase the conflict will be considered yes if at least one of the conditions:
1. will shoot more than 5 rockets at Israel every day for at least two weeks in a row
2.IDF will have direct land combat NOT by special forces on the land of Lebanon.
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ532 | |
2 | Ṁ210 | |
3 | Ṁ173 | |
4 | Ṁ165 | |
5 | Ṁ28 |
People are also trading
According to the data collected by Alma institute, there was escalation in the month of May.
More then 5 (all the columns are above the 5 line mark in the graphs) attacks each day between the 15th to the 31st, resulting in more then 14 days straight.
A reminder, these are the number of attacks, in each attack there is usually more then one rocket, so it is matching the criteria of at least 5 rockets per day.

The resolution criteria is clear, if it is just 13 days and not 14 it will count as NO
Despite the evident escalation. Pay attention that in the criteria I refer to the number of rockets, not number of attacks. Usually in an attack there is more than one rocket.
I didn’t think of it when I opened the market, but I should have done also a a ratio from the entire month, something like “60 % of the days in one month we’re with more that 5 attacks”
@CarmelHadar why? Looking at the bar charts in your link suggests it is a stable, low level conflict
So we are not looking on the same chart. When the question came, there was no 5 rockets per day, but in the end of may, there was. That meets the resolution criteria.
@CarmelHadar Sorry, I got this one mixed up with another market. I thought this was a purely vibe market but now I see it does have the rocket thing as a trigger. Still, I can't see in the (very long) post you linked where a daily rocket count is indicated for this to resolve YES.