Which of these non-technical barriers to longevity progress are most urgent to address?
19
Never closes
Coordination around aging biomarkers
Regulatory/FDA progress
(Interdisciplinary) collaboration
Talent acquisition
Public education
Funding
This question is asking about non-technical barriers to longevity progress you think those wanting to speed up longevity progress should prioritize addressing.
Disclaimers:
This question is part of Foresight’s 2023 Vision Weekends to help spark discussion amongst participants, so the phrasing and resolution criteria may be vaguer than I would normally like for this site. Apologies for that. We thought it would still be useful to make the market public to potentially inform other discussions.
If you would to add alternative answers, please do so in the comments!
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
1,000Related questions
Related questions
Will any company successfully develop a therapeutic treatment that rejuvenates healthspan by at least 10 years by 2030?
32% chance
Will the majority of developed nations prioritize funding for longevity research over space exploration by 2035?
46% chance
Will humans make breakthroughs, that would at minimum double the lifespan of a willing 30yo with high resources?
13% chance
If a treatment is shown to increase human lifespan in a randomized controlled trial by 2030, what was the treatment?
Will it be conclusively shown (through some way) that slowing the aging rate of AI researchers down (eg interventions decreasing DNAm age) will increase their net output/productivity by 2029?
14% chance
Will All Diseases and Aging be Effectively Cured by 2040?
14% chance
Will All Diseases and Aging be Effectively Cured by 2030?
9% chance
By 2030, will any treatment be shown to increase human lifespan in a randomized controlled trial?
Will All Diseases and Aging be Effectively Cured by 2035?
9% chance
Will All Diseases and Aging be Effectively Cured by 2045?
25% chance