
Background
The Trump administration has ordered the release of previously classified files related to the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., and Robert F. Kennedy. These files are expected to contain sensitive information about intelligence operations, surveillance activities, and investigative details that have been kept secret for decades.
Resolution Criteria
Each answer will be resolved independently based on credible media reports, official government statements, or direct examination of the released documents. For an answer to resolve as YES, there must be clear evidence that new, substantive information about that specific topic was revealed in the newly released files.
Answers will resolve as:
YES if new, substantive information on that topic is revealed
NO if no new information is revealed or if the information revealed is trivial/already known
N/A if the files are not released or if the specific topic cannot be definitively evaluated
On Adding Answers:
I reserve the right to N/A any answer that is not in keeping with the spirit of this market
If an answer is added after that answer has already satisfied the criteria to resolve, that answer will resolve N/A
Read Below:
Should there be a dispute, the rules provided will control over the answer to the question itself. While, the question is intended to provide an easy way for people to bet on their beliefs, it is not the end all be all, and all traders should look at the rules. Please don't hesitate to ask clarifying questions in the comments. In the unlikely event of significant ambiguity regarding whether the resolution criteria have been met. I reserve the right to resolve a question to a percentage that I deem fair. I will give notice before I do this.
People are also trading
@AaronSimansky Correct me if I'm talking nonsense, but under what circumstance could this have resolved YES given the market criteria? If the documents are reaffirming that, yes, there was surveillance, but nothing new came of it, how does this resolve?
(I have not pored over the pages personally, yet. I had some LLM summarize it for me, so I don't want to pretend I'm authoritative on this subject.)
@traders because this incorrectly merged two questions, this question will resolve N/A and a new question will be created.