
Resolves Yes when 100,000 jobs are taken over by AI(before 2027). Resolves No if condition not t by 1/1/2027
People are also trading
Sort of related: I thought everyone should see this: The members of the AI futures project have given an update and they appear to now be relying on the 80% time horizon length graph from METR for their predictions rather than the 50% time horizon length graph and their timelines have gotten longer. Here is there most recent update: https://open.substack.com/pub/aifutures1/p/ai-futures-model-dec-2025-update?r=6lp84s&utm_medium=ios. Daniel and Eli think that the scenario as laid out will basically be the same except that it will happen a few years later. Daniel pointed out that things appear to be 1 year behind the original scenario. As of right now Daniel thinks things will start to unfold in 2029 while Eli thinks things will start to unfold in 2030.
@ShyamJayesh still not clear. do we need a drop in employment by 100k due to AI? how are you quantifying the replacement
Yes, we need to reduce jobs by 100k due to AI.
@ShyamJayesh what if AI replaces some number of jobs, but also creates some number of jobs, s.t the net change is that less than 100k jobs are lost
@ShyamJayesh it doesn't sound like you're really thinking this through, what with the laconic responses and everything.
People get laid off all the time. You won't know that layoffs in company X are due to company Y doing things well with AI. Do you see that? Do you understand this fact, that you won't know that the crucial thing to resolve the market has happened?