
Resolves YES if proof of identity is posted (e.g. an “It’s me on MM” tweet), as soon as I get online and see a link,
otherwise resolves NO on 2022–12–31.
I’m gonna subsidize and bet NO to encourage them to come forward, and also because I’m doubting (but it’s a good meme either way). Reference: https://manifold.markets/MrGirl/do-you-guys-know-any-orbitors-that.
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ668 | |
2 | Ṁ247 | |
3 | Ṁ216 | |
4 | Ṁ174 | |
5 | Ṁ120 |
I positively verified the message below in Discord. I didn’t include a “resolve NO early” clause in the market description, so the original deadline stands. I can expedite the market resolution if all human YES holders sell all YES shares early. If you disagree, don’t sell.
To preempt more tomfoolery here’s a clarification: unless it is irrefutably shown that MrGirl controlled the account before today, I’ll resolve NO.
@Tomzy created a new option and the market immediately proceeded to be resolved in it's favour. 🤔
I think @DavidChee should look into this and issue the appropriate flairs. ⚖️
@hardy You can argue it's a weird coincidence but to accuse me of a rug pull is wrong, wouldn't it be exactly like MrGirl to play strange games like this?
@hardy You have made a fair deal of money from this situation as well, I have as much evidence to say it's you
@Tomzy Nope, not going to be making much since I only bought in after I had proof and the market was already so low. Only did it because you told me to put my Mana where my mouth is 🙂
@LLLLLL As long as the market is <<100%, he has an above-zero incentive for truth-telling – he can insider trade and win some charity donating power (around $20 equivalent now). This means, by the way, that believers should not push the market too high, not to smother this incentive.