As part of the Manifold Community Fund I submitted a project which included building out various improvements to Calibration City, a prediction market evaluation site. The project has grown tremendously, and I've just finished a new round of features that I'm super excited about!

I'm still working on things, but I've accomplished most of the features on my list. That's where you come in: I've been buried in this thing for so long I can't see its faults. I need fresh sets of eyes who can take a look and see what needs improving or explaining.

Some feedback I'm interested in, and the amount I will pay for each:

• M$100: General feedback on how the site feels to use, if you would ever use it on your own in the future, and under what circumstances you find it useful

• M$100: Things you found confusing, things that could be explained better, pain points when using the site

• M$100: Typos, visual bugs, etc

• M$100-500: Feature suggestions, especially those close to the core product

• M$100-500: Good external resources I can link to about prediction markets (research papers, news articles, etc.)

• M$100-500: Text or documentation that is factually incorrect or misleading

• M$1000+: Significant bugs, errors, or mistakes

I may pay out less for:

• Issues I am already aware of, such as poor usability on mobile or the general need for more documentation

• New features falling very far outside the scope of the project, such as individual user calibration

• Things that are very infeasible to implement

I'll be focused on polish, usability, and documentation before the next evaluation, but I want to keep a healthy roadmap of future improvements that I can continue working on over time. I plan to refill this bounty pool if I continue getting good suggestions!