What's true about time's arrow
60%
Different observers may have time's arrows pointing in different directions
48%
Anthropic selection: observers necessarily find themselves in regions with increasing entropy
47%
The arrow reflects brute initial conditions; there is no deeper explanation to be had
41%
Gravitational instability and cosmological expansion generate the observed thermodynamic arrow
41%
Growth of quantum entanglement under unitary dynamics explains thermodynamic irreversibility
35%
Inflationary cosmology dynamically selects special low-entropy initial conditions, explaining the arrow
34%
Entropy increase is emergent from coarse-graining and typicality; no deeper micro-physical asymmetry is needed
34%
Time’s arrow arises from asymmetric boundary conditions at both temporal ends (two-time boundary conditions)
34%
Landauer’s principle and information-erasure costs make entropy increase a consequence of information processing constraints
33%
The Past Hypothesis is a fundamental lawlike assumption, and a low-entropy beginning fixes the arrow
30%
Computational irreversibility and algorithmic complexity growth are the deeper source of the arrow
25%
Objective quantum-collapse dynamics are time-directed (e.g., GRW), grounding macroscopic irreversibility
25%
Penrose’s Weyl curvature hypothesis: near-vanishing initial Weyl curvature sets the gravitational arrow

Is there a deeper explanation for why we tend to see entropy increase? Is there a deeper explanation for the second law of thermodynamics?

A proposition resolves when there is widespread scientific consensus about it.

Anyone can add answers.

By trading in this market, you agree to let me be the judge for subjective matters associated with this market (e.g., what counts as "widespread scientific consensus"). When in doubt, ask before trading.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

@ttoe my inclination is it would be the reverse macroscale

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy