Trump is he right ? Global trade is a zero sum game
9
100Ṁ637
Apr 15
4%
chance

Resolution Criteria

This market resolves to YES if there is clear evidence that global trade is a zero-sum game (where one country's gain is necessarily another country's loss of equal magnitude). It resolves to NO if the evidence indicates that global trade is not a zero-sum game (where multiple countries can simultaneously benefit from trade).

Background

Donald Trump has repeatedly characterized international trade as a zero-sum game, where one country's gain must come at another's expense. This view underpins his trade policies, including the use of tariffs and his focus on trade deficits as evidence that the US is "losing" in trade relationships.

In economic theory, a zero-sum game is one where the total of gains and losses among participants equals zero. In contrast, a positive-sum game is one where the total gains can exceed the total losses, creating net benefits for participants collectively.

Most economists argue that international trade is a positive-sum activity where countries can specialize in producing goods and services based on their comparative advantages, leading to increased efficiency, productivity, and benefits for all trading partners. This view, dating back to Adam Smith and David Ricardo, forms the foundation of modern trade theory.

Considerations

  • Trump's perspective on trade aligns more with mercantilist views from the 17th and 18th centuries, which emphasized trade surpluses and minimizing imports.

  • The focus on goods trade deficits often ignores the role of services, investment flows, and other economic interactions between countries.

  • While certain sectors or workers may experience negative effects from trade, this doesn't mean that trade overall is zero-sum at the national level.

  • Tariffs and trade restrictions can disrupt global supply chains and potentially harm both the imposing country and its trading partners.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!


Sort by:
bought Ṁ80 NO28d

There is already clear evidence its not. Do you want me to link it to you?

@remedyrain Yeah this is already uncontroversial among serious economists. I don't know what OP wants

What is this?

What is Manifold?
Manifold is the world's largest social prediction market.
Get accurate real-time odds on politics, tech, sports, and more.
Or create your own play-money betting market on any question you care about.
Are our predictions accurate?
Yes! Manifold is very well calibrated, with forecasts on average within 4 percentage points of the true probability. Our probabilities are created by users buying and selling shares of a market.
In the 2022 US midterm elections, we outperformed all other prediction market platforms and were in line with FiveThirtyEight’s performance. Many people who don't like betting still use Manifold to get reliable news.
ṀWhy use play money?
Mana (Ṁ) is the play-money currency used to bet on Manifold. It cannot be converted to cash. All users start with Ṁ1,000 for free.
Play money means it's much easier for anyone anywhere in the world to get started and try out forecasting without any risk. It also means there's more freedom to create and bet on any type of question.
© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules