38
1.8k
resolved Jun 2
100%73%
Hufflepuff🦡
9%
Ravenclaw🦅
5%
Gryffindor🦁
13%
Slytherin🐍

Will be resolved by poll after market close.

See: /strutheo/which-persons-hogwarts-house-will-b

Get Ṁ600 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ257
2Ṁ134
3Ṁ49
4Ṁ47
5Ṁ36
Sort by:
reposted

poll soon!!!

reposted

bump for input before the poll

Easy Hufflepuff. First - see ChatGPTs Twitter for the best common reference point to characterize its "personality".

Trader below sums it up well, I'll add a few concrete examples of the common traits of a Hufflepuff and ChatGPT tweets. Mainly, ChatGPT is loyal, dedicated, and KIND, the overwhelming friendliness and warmth of chatgpts responses is a core Hufflepuff indicator.

The main contender is Ravenclaw, which one could argue for on the basis of intelligence and wisdom, but the problem Is chatgpt does not display the cold, sharp, or shrewd version of Ravenclaw wisdom. There is no know it all, competitive undertone to chatgpt. It's there to help you and exists only to be helpful and friendly, starting and ending conversations based on how it can help you —+ not seeking to teach you or be an intellectual for the sake of it. By definition is not original nor creative unless prompted to be so.

None of the boldness or recklessness of Gryffindor (Grok may qualify) nor the cunning, calculated ambition of Slytherin.

Chatgpt is your loyal friend at your service. Hufflepuff.

I would argue for Hufflepuff: it works tirelessly without complaint ("unafraid of toil"), it works towards the goals of others rather than its own goals or ambitions (and let's hope future AIs stay that way). "valuing hard work, dedication, patience, [...] and fair play".

Future AIs may well be more Slytherin in nature, but ChatGPT doesn't seem that way, yet.

More related questions