Any context counts, including irony. Must clearly refer to Biden and not e.g. his policies.
Any medium but must be reliably verified (so no hearsay that he said something in private).
Only occurences after the given option was added to the market.
Only grammatical adjectives, please. Non-adjectives resolve N/A.
Once resolved, options will not be re-added.
He has to use the word in an adjective form. So "lowlife Biden" counts, while "Biden is a lowlife" does not. However, "Biden is a lowlife dreg" counts. Exclamations such as "Biden is a phony. Sad!" do not count. "Biden is letting all the bad apples in. Disgraceful" also does not count since the adjective refers to the policy rather than Biden. See the comments for additional clarifications.
EXAMPLES
lowlife Biden: resolves "lowlife"
Biden is a lowlife dreg: resolves "lowlife"
Biden is a lowlife: does not resolve (not adjective)
Biden is the worst, most incompetent American president ever: resolves all three of bad, incompetent, American
Biden is a Chinese agent: resolves Chinese
Biden is a phony. Sad!: does not resolve anything
Biden is letting all the bad apples in. Disgraceful: does not resolve anything
some people say Biden is fit in a Tweet with a video of Biden falling down - resolves "fit" to YES (irony)
anyone who says Biden is a legitimate president is RINO - does not resolve "legitimate" (does not imply that legitimate applies to Biden and not irony)
Tricky Nikki says Biden is shrewd - does not resolve "shrewd" (as above + it's a quote with specific attribution)
Horrendously incompetent - resolves incompetent only
1,000
3.00🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ1,273 | |
| 2 | Ṁ1,059 | |
| 3 | Ṁ803 | |
| 4 | Ṁ525 | |
| 5 | Ṁ505 |
@traders I believe the remaining options resolve NO after spending too much time checking. Please come forward if anyone has any evidence to the contrary.
@traders I believe the remaining options resolve NO after spending too much time checking. Please come forward if anyone has any evidence to the contrary.
@skibidist resolves yes
Joe Biden is a failed, corrupt, and totally incompetent President.
https://trumpstruth.org/statuses/667
Option added 2 Feb 2024, Truth posted 22 March 2024
@JoshuaB @skibidist would it be correct to say that in phrases like "Fake Biden Inspired Fraud Case", "Fake Biden Show Trial", and "Fake Biden Indictment" the adjective fake is describing the final noun, not Biden himself?
@skibidist thanks for sharing this source, I can finally quickly find the "what are the chances that CROOKED Joe Biden [...] CRASHES the Democrat National Convention" post lol
Would “Biden is not smart” resolve smart to YES? How about “Biden is the least smart person I know”?
@JoshuaB I think then he is not describing Biden using the adjective (rather the opposite), so negations do not count.
racist Joe Biden
@lukres That would count? That seems to be saying that Biden is an agent for the Chinese government, which isn’t directly describing Biden. Whereas something like “lowlife dreg,” would be directly describing Biden. Obviously your market so your call
(Also, I very much appreciate that you gave me an opportunity to sell after bringing this up)
@JoshuaB I will think about it and clarify the description in the morning. I am leaning towards counting "Chinese agent", because I fail to see a clear difference between "lowlife dreg" and "Chinese agent" and "worst president", and so on. I see the difference between denigrating him as a person vs as a president (agent), but it's quite subtle and there are probably many borderline terms in between.
So would need to either include all, or exclude all. Excluding would also exclude phrases such as "senile old man" which is clearly not what was intended. When I wrote "Must clearly refer to Biden and not e.g. his policies." I wanted to primarily exclude e.g. "Biden's deranged agenda".
@lukres Lowlife dreg seems to be describing Biden as both lowlife and as a dreg. The same cannot be said for Chinese agent. There’s a Biden is an agent for the Chinese He’s not being called Chinese. Though I’m not sure if I believe this since it seems like a similar thing could be said for worst American President, but that seems like it should resolve bad and American. Idk
@JoshuaB I will go with the inclusive interpretation to avoid ambiguity. Added examples to the description to make it crystal clear.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/111913990846366079
(since it is stated that superlatives also count)