MANIFOLD
How soon after genociding a population does the colonizer become indigeneous?
20
resolved Jun 14
50-100 years
400-1000 years
<50 years
more than 2000 years
100-200 years
200-400 years
1000-2000 years

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

SA

Never. The culture of the colonisers is different.

@100Anonymous are you saying there are no native Belgians, since the Ghauls were killed by the Romans?

@AlexanderTheGreater I think in practice this would mean that there are practically no indigenous people anywhere.

I'm excluding times before 2000 BC, when the first empires were created.

@100Anonymous so Mayan Empire, Nubian Empire and Qin Dynasty don't count as empires? Only empires can commit genocide and replace the locals?

@AlexanderTheGreater I would like to bring you attention to the fact that we are all the descendants of 1 mother in ~1000 BC. That's why it should not count before 2000 BC

@AlexanderTheGreater was there ever a Mayan empire? My layman understanding is that all the way from the rise of El Mirador in the 300s BC to the fall of Peten Itza in the AD 1500s the region geopolitically resembled archaic and classical period ancient Greece, with a bunch of independent city states sharing a culture, and occasionally a few of them forming short lived fragile decentralised alliances (e.g. League of Mayapan). Very different to the Aztec empire further northwest, with many separate cultures being ruled under a single state, more comparable to Achaemenid Persia (or maybe Neo Assyria given all the horrific war crimes lol)

@100Anonymous can you elaborate on the 1 mother thing? Are you talking about Eve from Abrahamic religions? Given that you've mentioned you're in India, would it be a safe assumption that you believe in Islam?

@TheAllMemeingEye No! I saw a RealLifeLore video stating that geneologists have found this. May not be true, though. I'm Hindu

@100Anonymous The existence of a mitochondrial Eve is a very counterintuitive mathematical necessity, but it does not confer any cultural significance. 2000 bc seems off by a few oom

I'd say it's about whether you're born and went through childhood there, so if it's mostly young adults doing the colonising and there's normal life expectancy then plausibly 50-100y sounds like the timeframe in which the next generations become the majority population

Nz?

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy